Nikon Coolscan 9000 versus scans obtained at photo labs

Here’s a quick comparison, in reference to a recent discussion over at dpgr.gr:

– a 6×7 Portra 160 negative, scanned with the Nikon, at 4000 dpi (39 Mb jpeg original)


– same negative scanned by a Noritsu photolab machine (139 Mb jpeg original)

(warning: links point to large files, which, however, are not the originals)

My sense is that the Noritsu scan has smoother tonality and equivalent resolution. Unfortunately, it costs 1-2 euros each.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: